Sunday, April 14, 2013

Laws of Emotion

Misleading title. Before you get any further misled, let me tell you, I am not going to be proclaiming laws of emotion here. I don't think an Emotional Einstein exists. Well if she did, I guess I should say emotional Van Gogh in that case.

I have always spent quite some time trying to choose between the absolute and the intangible. My father is a doctor, but I think his first instinct was to be a botanist and I guess that is why poems about nature move him and he read them out loud to us, he would talk about nature and infinite wonders it offers and I guess imparted that spirit in me.

For years I have wondered, with my limited understanding to figure out why I am not able to fit myself in just any job, why am I torn between trying to be practical and trying to follow some irrational instinct to explore something vague. To me the answer now seems to be somewhat in how my father influenced me, or maybe how I am a little like him, but grew up in a different era. So while with every passing grade, the emphasis on Math and Science became stronger and my adolescent self grabbed to that identity and went on to prove myself, somewhere in childhood a love for poetry and a wonder for what life is, was planted and it stuck. Sudden financial independence, isolated urban life and the inability to express or even clearly understand feelings for men led me to throw myself into trying to find what it was that I could hope to salvage.

But the thought emotions, and understanding our emotional lives came to me in 2005, while still working at my first job. I remember standing at a balcony, distraught, lonely, confused, not knowing I was, just feeling a surge of emotions, feeling trapped in a mechanical system, feeling un-understood. All confused, having spent my late teen years trying hard to get into an engineering school, becoming a "smart engineer," those who are changing the world, the desire to become creative had begun to nudge its way in.

I remember, the thought first creeping in my head and I shuting it down, embarassed that I even thought of it. It was like an alien voice inside of me. Schizophrenic much?


I just have been thinking about emotions and our emotional needs as I have been reflecting and percolating more these days. Little more with ease these days, telling myself I am studying the laws of emotion :). Its tied to art, the indulging into it, why do we do it, good or bad. How frivolous it seems to me when I look from my hard-working parents' point of view. For my father, who came from a village, probably transcended hundreds of years of mechanisation and industrialisation of the world as he moved to a big city, then to taking care of us, from relying on water to cool magoes to buying a fridge and mom to be able to buy food processing gear to make and store ice cream. All those comforts weren't provided by artists. But, my dad used to write journals, journals full of poems and songs. I think it was he who instilled in us a love for poetry. He still narrates those verses to me, when I am home, though I think he has forgotten them more, nothing new added to it. Going through our school books and teaching us sometimes, kept his love for poetry and literature alive. But now, I think he just worries. I think, its religion and politics that occupy his thoughts, other than his weakening body, his farway children. So when I think of it, thinking of emotions is an indulgence. Following instincts is an indulgence. In a country where being able to afford the fruits of 21st century can only be a result of years of meticulous study or inheritance, maybe it is an indulgence. To a family of engineers, teachers, doctors, respectable job-holders, it is.

Yet here I am, feeling disconnected from that country that I grew up in, trying to connect, fearing I never will be, in a country where my days of stay dwindle, dependent on further bureaucratic pleas if I so desire. I don't try, will not try to extend my stay here, I fortunately have a family, in that region of the world where I can stay forever, because its the country where I was born. I do miss it, my mind wanders and thinks of the dusty summers there, my home town and the painting lessons I took there. My walks to the class through brick alleys, sometimes clean, sometimes splattered with buffalo dung. I think the buffaloes were occasionally around too, when not too hot. I always remember summer more than winter. Maybe because I visited my hometown only in summers as a child.

I realise I see it through a nostalgic lens when I think back of home, and all the cities I grew up in, studied in, worked in before I moved here but thats why I am here in this city, New York. I am here, not because I am avoiding familiarity, well yes I am. I am indulging in thinking about us as emotional beings. I am going to indulge and write anything, draw anything, act something, say something, watch people and if not contrived, have conversations and love someone, maybe love everyone. I think understanding emotions is about understanding everyone. Does that happen?

I have been anxious, angry, lonely, all things everyone has been, some a little more than others, some a little less but I remember those days, my first year of working and waking up every morning with a panic as if waking up everyday in a prison and not being sure if it was one, being so distressed that was the first time I reasoned why there were poets and artists in the world. If it wasn't for them, we could go on understnading and explaning this world in terms of mechanics. At that point I thought, they were all about just delving into emotions, and sobbing their hearts out, I guess I didnt realise, I was equating them to whiners. But there is more than that, I think. Chekhov said, "You are right in demanding that an artist approach his work consciously, but you are confusing two concepts: the solution of a problem and the correct formulation of a problem."

Tuesday, December 25, 2012

This Place

I am heading into another phase of life. Post school one. And I guess, I don't have impending deadlines so I find me here. Looking at this blog that's still where it has always been. On the internet. Strange things, these interwebs.

I look back at the blog and realise that since I have been at school, I haven't said much here. And now I pause to re-contemplate the nature of this blog. When I started this blog, I had meant it as a way for me to have all my sordid and hopefully un-sordid reflections in one place. Or else, journals, computers, everything just is an easy way to have it all scattered. And now I wonder why is this barely visited creature still around? To what does this poor guy/girl/whatever deserve this treatment? That it just sits there forever. Maybe till the end of internet. Not knowing if it will ever be visited, added to, or just forgotten.

I guess thats no different than a diary or an e-diary. But, for some reason they don't announce their presence as boldly as a blog does. I guess the fact that I sometimes treat it as if I am just writing for my own and thats what the intent was, but knowing that once in a while strange or familiar eyes visit these pages, is what makes it odd.

And now I am done with school. So I am back to my pre-school mode. And by that I mean, I maybe back here to ramble more frequently again. And as of now I think I might be talking Kurosawa next. 

Monday, October 01, 2012

The Trouble with Third Act

Over the last few months, I have written several drafts for the short that I would be shooting for my thesis. In the last few drafts, I keep playing with different tones and different inciting incidents. And every draft, I feel like I am close to something extremely promising. But, that something that will make it perfect, is still missing.

It's the third act. In all the drafts, something for the sake of it happens in the third act. But, it does not feel satisfying. It feels forced and arbitrary. Of course it does. Because the third act, echoes life and the people you meet. I always remember when I first met them, not the last. There is no dramatic end to anything or anyone in my life. There is no storming of a door, and its over. At least not for me. One fine day you stop and try to remember, how did that end, when was the last time we exchanged words? Were they exchanged knowing that they would be last? I guess not. Especially now that we have phones and internet, no one thinks they are going away forever. As a result, the fine line of being together and apart is blurred. Not for me. But the goodbyes to people in life are.

I don't have anything to wear

I am supposed to be getting ready to go to work.
I have nothing to wear!
Nothing!
Have been thinking for the last half an hour.
This never happens to me.
I just put something on and leave.
My face is cracking up.
And yes, its all because of this little boy.
Or is he a little boy?
And am I just a toy?
Or is it?
Nah, its me.
Its me.
Its always me.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Grizzly Man makes me Reconsider Herzog

A week since I saw Grizzly man. Questions and questions: has Godard moved in his later years to more impassable and Herzog more accessible? Herzog's fascination with "inner turmoil".

Next step: revist all Herzog I saw earlier starting with Best Fiend and compare. What is the essence that carries on?

Got a director to solve. Has this man deliberatley made this film - Grizzly Man more accesible? Need to revisit all those I saw before and dismissed as indulgent exercises. Need to re-locate Herzog in ze tiny brain that i have.

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Breaking the Silence

And then the rest of the story went crazy, somewhat like the ferry wheels at the movie preview. Yes and I did think about the time I spent at home. The monkeys spring in first who would tear out the plants and shred the leaves. Somewhere among the smell of piss on the Ghat the breeze died. I don’t remember what it felt like on the outside. Incoherence reigned supreme. Several trains collided and kept colliding in my head. It was all-blank. But good. Maybe bad. But the best blank was when I was here. Best blank without people around you. Maybe.
Never any certainty.
Not sure if I want certainty. Don’t editorialize when you write. Try not to think when you wake up in the middle of the night. Telling yourself to take it easy in the night and dismissing it all in the day. Ramble sounds more sensible than nothing. Than everything. Because ramble is what it is. Fragments are what exist. Parts are all I see. No wholes.

Office spaces are best for that. No the worst and the best.

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Turtles Can Fly

Iraq. War. A story revolving around children in a refugee camp. Dread of gloom and melodrama (maybe for someone who grew up on Bollywood) descends. Its none of that, its not even the exact opposite .

I found this storytelling very powerful. Maybe because Coetzee's writing-caused-wow is still in my head, but i think this film reminds me of the way he writes. Not stopping to dwell or elaborate on emotions and struggles, taking you through a quick tour of people's lives. Where it departs from his writing stems from the cultural ground from which it is born. It does tell a very poignant tale injected with humour skirting off cliches. Rather it makes me think of cliches we don't register. Picture this, kids strolling through an ammunition bazaar, trading mines they dug out for rifles and ammunition. What emotion would you expect to accompany this visual? The first time i saw it i was sharing the sense of excitement and fun the kids are having at getting their new stuff.

I am replicating a very succinct and apt commentary on the film:
Heartbreak in the High Hills of No Man's Land., 13 March 2006
10/10
Author: PizzicatoFishCrouch from United Kingdom

"The trauma of war has been an issue much covered in cinema, but in this film, we are shown the impact that it has on those who are most innocent of all – the children. The orphaned children are a range of interesting characters presented to us here, from Satellite, a sharp TV programmer to Pashow, an armless but still doggedly determined boy. The supporting children are shown as bright eyed watchers of war, eagerly awaiting it so that they can try their hand at the missiles, which, at first sounds amusing, but then escalates into something much more horrific, and we follow their misadventures through grainy camera-work, improvised dialogue and flashbacks.

The performances delivered by the children are nothing short of astounding. In the lead, Soran Ebrahim is in parts a mixture of caprice, zest and energy, and it is he who grasps our heart and makes for the first, slightly more light-hearted part of the film. In a completely different role, Avaz Latif is the film's heartbreak, and the one that endures the worst. Her performance is wordless, but she manages to portray all her deepest emotions through a look or gesture. When we delve deeper into the plot to realise exactly how much her character has suffered, it is then that the horror of war kicks in.

Turtles Can Fly is not one for the easily depressed. Truth be told, after watching it, I was still in tears for several minutes, utterly helpless and wishing that something could be done about the constant loss of innocence. Its message is blatant, and though a bleak one, presented in a harsh, disturbing war, makes a welcome change from all the Left, Right and Centre propaganda given to us in the Media. Turtles is a film that speaks for itself; no advertising needed."

Friday, January 01, 2010

Avatar in 2D

I feel let down. My thoughts on Avatar 2D. My disappointment stems from the fact that I was geared up for an experience rivaling LOTR and Star Wars (both mentioned in Roger Ebert’s review though in my quick look at the review I missed the context) and the fact that I was watching Tarkovsky’s Solaris a day before I saw Avatar and that I saw it in 2D! Though I did go from Varanasi to Lucknow just to see the film at least in English.

Seen stripped of its 3D wonder I am sure lot of people will dismiss as just another special effects war story which people might have trouble remembering in few years. But the fact is, it is in 3D and from what I have read I am still pretty sure it’s a spectacular experience. And that made me realize what technical advances in filmmaking had led to. Rather the word “film” itself might be becoming obsolete anytime now. The more we advance in visual, sound excellence the less effort required on drama and story. A different kind of effort , not a purist’s effort.

And that’s what cinema has done(in comparison to theatre), shifted the burden of engagement from story to visual maneuvers. I can see myself over the school years never never letting up my love for theatre and barely being gripped by films until Jurassic Park. And then in college when I started running to movie halls it was an escape that I sought and yet amidst that passivity the thought struck loud and clear. My beloved theatre did not have an fractional influence that cinema had over zillions of people huddling into movie halls to escape the tedium of their lives. And after seeing Avatar I realized it all over again that before anything films are an experiential, immediate, far-reaching but diluted medium. Though in past and people still try to treat it with reverence and passion of an artist , they are the marginal beings in the movie industry and apart from that I don’t know how many would even consider them to be an artist. The sort of artist a painter can be.

I am not dismissing Avatar, though that was my first reaction and I have let weeks go by to wholly say that it is not so. I would love to see this 3D wonder and be swept into another world, like LOTR and Star Wars did. Though these epics and Avatar are not comparable when it comes to the story and character. These two are epics with characters who get trilogies to show their shades, for struggles to persist while Avatar is much much barer when it comes to a layered script or complex characters. Jake Sully who is not exactly Frodo, or an Anakin who is given quite a lot of years before he jumps into the evil bandwagon. The three months span for Jake to make his decision that also without very much as second thoughts made me lose my connect to the character.

So now I dismiss the epic comparision , it is unsuitable . Its not an epic , not a great story of human drama. So I recall to me Hellboy, which if I had seen stripped of its imaginative characters would be quite not the Hellboy I love. Having watched Avatar in 2D made me think though I love epics how much of a fan would I have been if I had watched those with lesser enthralling visuals. The landscapes that one is treated to while watching LOTR, the entirely different world in Star Wars.

How oblivious I have been to the impact of production design, location and photography to films! Avatar has opened led me to quite a few outstanding specimens from my ignorance galores. So hoping a chance to view Avatar in 3D works out and then I can re-think it all.

Yet …. It did bother me the story and let me make just one point to assuage my viewing displeasure.
The protagonist's paraplegia makes me think his conflict is not there. The second life that his new legs have gotten him, the life that he has experienced in Pandora, where he commands the attention of everybody in Otacamaya clan, he is the "chosen one" why would he give it back. Of course he is offered new legs as a human. But for someone who lives very mcuh in the moment, has no fear, has no contemplative bend of nature this was the natural decision. The story does not afford a view into if he had a reason to want to be a human. So it is not surprising or aggrandizing when we see our hero choose to be a Na'avi. Of course he makes the choice after he has burnt his bridge to human race and has established himself almost like the king of the clan. Choosing to stay in a fairytale world of Na'avi who seem to be living so peacefully. There are other things too, but I think I will be waging an unfair criticism. This bit is enough to exorcise my demons of disappointment.

I did like Zoe Saldana's performance or maybe the Na'avi having big eyes (the wide eyed thing that Disney heavily employed for its female lead animation characters) worked in her character's favour.